Found this article today:
https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/607186/
Essentially it calls out Scalia on his interpretation of historical language and says he got the individual part wrong in
Heller. At first blush the historical analysis methodology seemed to cherry-pick how teens were used to get a predetermined conclusion. Or am I wrong and
Heller may get a revisit in the future?
ETA: link was broken, fixed