Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mavrider
if you don't concede that you don't know what Kuenzli is thinking at that time then you would know that the reverse is true.
|
Go back and read your own question again. You were basically asking me to read Kuenzli's mind
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mavrider
But you'll have to concede that this may have been Mr Kuenzli's breaking point and could have sevearly injured/killed Fish had he not.
|
How could I know this was Kuenzli's "breaking point"? Could have would have is no good to the court. Kuenzli could have done a lot of things, the standard is would a reasonable person believe that Fish's life was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm based on Kunezli's actions and I say no based on what I have read. In fact, the more I read about it and how Kuenzli acted during his previous blowups the more I think Fish was not in danger and overreacted to Kuenzli's bizarre but not deadly behavior. Apparently another group of people called ajury agreed. No mind reading involved or needed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mavrider
But I leave out with the utter astonishment that you would call Fish arrogant.
|
The DA referred to Fish as arrogant and I think that helped in his conviction.