Quote:
|
if you are not there, he has less opportunity to do anything to you- or you to do anything further to him. if you are not there, his accomplice or other compatriots cannot suddenly appear and engage you out of retaliation or in a effort to secure his escape. if you are not there to fight with his compatriots, you wont likely have the occasion to begin a new firefight, perhaps miss a target and harm a bystander.
|
WOW! That is a stretch! I could say just the opposite "If you are not there..."
Less is always less. This is the fallacy in your reasoning.
IMHO