View Single Post
Old January 11, 2012, 09:15 AM   #23
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Quote:
The old CUP standard was less accurate than the new psi standard, but it was not a "dubious method." Guns were designed and ammunition was loaded by factories for decades using that method, and it was not blowing-up guns. Pressure-tested load data based on CUP methods should not be confused with some of the early handloading manuals that did NOT pressure test their data by the copper-crusher method, but instead used MUCH less reliable methods such as loading up to sticky extraction and backing-off a small amount.
"Dubious methods" is whatever they did to come up with the data in Speer #8. Perhaps they tested in cold weather only? Something's not right with that book.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03481 seconds with 8 queries