|
Yes restrictions on guns and magazine capacity would be a violation of my rights as a citizen. I would give up neither. If LEOs require AR style rifles and high capacity magazines to protect themselves then that is what I should have. I remember when all LEOs had was a .38 Special revolver with 6 shots but as threats increased so did the weapons they carried. The lady in Georgia was lucky protecting herself and children with her .38 caliber revolver but what if there were 2 criminals? There is no compromise on Constitutional rights as Ben Franklin said "They that would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
|