Quote:
|
I didn't say it was court level controlled condition documented proof of SEE. I merely wanted to give the source for completeness. It carries at least as much weight as any other anecdotal report of SEE. That is, it's an alert, neither to be blindly believed nor entirely dismissed from a safety standpoint. It's a valid indication the matter needs further study.
|
On this we fully agree...
I do not blindly ignore it, but in the absence of repeatable empirical evidence, I have to look at it as no more than anecdotal...
I sincerely want to thank you all for being patient with me...
I really am trying to grasp the situation, but I am stubborn and do not like things that have 'untidy' explanations...