I think that such a provision is unconstitutionally vague and unenforceable. No rifle in existence is capable of distinguishing between a detachable magazine holding the magic 10 rounds or fewer, and one magazine holding 11 or more - either the magazine fits in the rifle or it does not, and ANY detachable magazine can be reverse-engineered or modified to increase its capacity beyond whatever the statutorily-mandated limit might be.
You have to wonder why the law is worded this way - it'd have been a lot simpler for them to simply ban the high capacity magazines rather than the rifles which they might fit into.
|