Quote:
|
Looking at what little you've quoted it's not nearly as compelling as the Texas study. They broke down the rate of 21+ holders, and non-holders, males, and females, and types of crimes that would result in the revocation of a Texas CHL.
|
The TX data is easy to get to. Given what some think of the people in the state, the stats are...compelling.
Mr. Norris, I saw a comment in another blog that Peruta does not become effective until the time has run for an appeal to SCOTUS.
I thought this incorrect. I thought that if the en banc clock runs out with no action, Peruta then applies...unless and until someone files with SCOTUS (within the 90 day period).
Please advise.