Thread: Basic math
View Single Post
Old April 12, 2013, 11:14 AM   #11
Gaerek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 939
I want to say that what I'm about to say is something I don't agree with, but will be the counter to AB's point, if he brought it up to a grabber.

He wasn't shooting constantly, he was shooting in bursts. He's walk into an area, and fire as quickly as he could. Then he'd move to another area, and do the same. So although the ROF for the entire massacre was relatively low, the ROF for each "burst" was likely high. If he had a bolt gun, he might not have been able to do what he had done.

Again, although there is some logic in that, it doesn't pass the common sense test for guns in general. It's just the counter you'll get to that point.
Gaerek is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03264 seconds with 8 queries