View Single Post
Old June 6, 2016, 12:24 PM   #148
OldMarksman
Staff
 
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
...the police basically said "hey if he was going to advance against someone willing to use deadly force he must have intended severe harm".....
I don't interpret it that way at all. Intent would only provide one part of a successful justification. It would not be sufficient. Remember A, O, J, P.

Quote:
Basically the use of deadly force (more correctly the continued attack after the use of deadly force) is being used as evidence that deadly force was justified.
Where do you get that idea?

The video shows pretty clearly that an unarmed man was trying to grab a man who had a gun. The only serious risk was that of the attacker acquiring the gun.

Quote:
While I get that the point might be accurate it is not something that we should be willing to use to color our discussions on the matter because of its circular nature.
I see nothing circular about it.
OldMarksman is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02489 seconds with 8 queries