If i was giving an uneducated layman's detailed analyzation, i read it like this:
Quote:
|
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
|
An actual official militia, might be required one day for defense from XYZ, so folks have the right to keep arms, don't fool with it.
I try not to read too much into things, i don't think they were speaking pig-latin. I have alternative readings depending on the commas, definition of
state and phrase placement swaps, but all of them still hinge on that last
shall not be infringed bit.
