September 8, 2011, 12:38 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Location: NE,PA
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
What report have you seen that says a Japanese soldier removed any part of his rifle??? These rifles were property of the Emperor and removing or modifying it in any way would have meant BIG trouble for the offending soldier.
If you have proof to substantiate your claims that the Japanese soldier was the one to remove these items, PLEASE post them as I am yet to see any reports that it was nothing more than American GI's removing these parts after capture.
|
+1!
|
|
|