https://www.personaldefenseworld.com...armed-robbers/
At about the 3-minute point in the video, the narrator States unequivocally that because the second robber was in cahoots with the first, you can legitimately assume that he is also an armed thread and engage him. Does anybody know of cases in which this actually happened, and how those cases turned out for the person who stopped the robbery?
Somehow it's hard to imagine that shooting the Armed robber, and then shooting his accomplice before you have any visual confirmation that he's armed, wouldnt cause all sorts of problems...?
The narrator did not specify that this was the case just in South America, or only for off-duty police. Anyone listening to this video would come away with the idea that this is okay for anybody who is armed and acts to stop a robbery.