View Single Post
Old September 7, 2011, 08:50 AM   #40
Al Norris
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
Peruta's reply brief was due yesterday, Sept. 6th. It must have been posted late at night, as it wasn't there by the time I called it a night.

It's available now, however and I have attached it to this post.

Chuck Michel attacks and destroys everything the County has implied, ignored and generally misconstrued. The brief even goes so far as to wonder how the Nordyke panel could have gotten its decision so wrong, when the weight of Heller and McDonald were against it.

All in all, a good read.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Peruta CA9 Appellant Reply Brief 2011_09_06.pdf (184.8 KB, 43 views)
Al Norris is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03322 seconds with 9 queries