The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - Kachalsky v. Cacase - NY Carry

SilverBulletZ06 · September 12, 2012, 12:59 PM

There were two distinct differences with regard to questioning.

When judges wanted to question Gura they used hypothetical situations and reducto ad absurdum questions. When the judges questioned the states attorney, they used facts and case law.

I found that to be most interesting of all.

September 12, 2012, 12:59 PM	#64
SilverBulletZ06 Member Join Date: March 17, 2012 Posts: 32	There were two distinct differences with regard to questioning. When judges wanted to question Gura they used hypothetical situations and reducto ad absurdum questions. When the judges questioned the states attorney, they used facts and case law. I found that to be most interesting of all.