View Single Post
Old December 29, 2010, 04:17 PM   #113
publius42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2002
Posts: 1,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnbt
They did. Guilty. He wasn't living at his parents' house and therefore he wasn't in the act of moving from one residence to another.
The jury did not decide that question because the judge decided it. There was testimony that the guns were at the apartment at some point before the seizure. There is also that "faulty" police report saying that Brian had the guns locked in the car to keep them away from the drunks at an upcoming party. I'd like to know what was "faulty" about that report. For those not familiar with that author, he seems to have a bit of a beef with law enforcement, and might characterize a report as "faulty" if it had some technical flaw unrelated to the matter being reported.

In either case, he is not supposed to move the guns back and forth to his mother's house because it is not one of the few places you are allowed to take your guns, and he is not allowed to just drive around with them in the trunk either. The judge's decision in the matter was not the craziest thing here. The law itself is.
publius42 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03201 seconds with 8 queries