View Single Post
Old July 19, 2011, 03:13 PM   #19
Evan Thomas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Buck
Vanya mentions the background checks done on applicants. Where the problem arises is once a person is allowed to move in, it is possible some of their "non-desirable" relatives might need a place to stay. I think this may be one of the dark horses in the closet they do not want to admit to.
Good point.

Quote:
My Personal Opinion: If the people who live there wish to give up their individual rights, let them, but do not make other who wish to preserve the freedoms and liberties we are entitled to, also give up theirs.
It's somewhat the same problem as that of restricting the gun rights of the mentally ill, which people on our side often suggest as an alternative to gun bans in the aftermath of rampage shootings. Yes, OK, there may be reasons why a given population is more likely, statistically, to abuse those rights. But individuals, even if they're members of a "risky" population, ought not to be deprived of their rights without some form of due process; to allow this is to put the rights of all of us at risk.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry.

Last edited by Evan Thomas; July 19, 2011 at 03:25 PM.
Evan Thomas is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02507 seconds with 8 queries