View Single Post
Old February 3, 2020, 06:37 PM   #5
stephen426
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2005
Posts: 3,803
While the round doesn't met the minimum recommended penetration, the expansion is rather impressive and will certainly do a lot of soft tissue damage. A large wound channel like that would most likely cause a fair amount of blood loss. Would a FMJ really be a more reliable man stopper if it just poked a .32" hole? There isn't going to be any realy hydrostatic damage from such a low velocity. Thoughts?
__________________
The ATF should be a convenience store instead of a government agency!
stephen426 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04630 seconds with 8 queries