Quote:
Originally Posted by ClayInTx
Peetza, you wanted answers. You just got seven of ‘em!
|
Those aren't answers, my friend. Those constitute a description of the situation found in the OP. My suggestion takes into account every one of those conditions and does just as much to "feel out" the situation as does any other method yet posited. Those are all good reasons to feel uneasy and suspicious about the situation. We've established that it was likely a scam, and could have been dangerous.
I don't know, I guess I don't understand why my position is so difficult to accept.
I said that the OP, King Edward, acted in a safe and proper way IMO, if that was the way he felt that he should have reacted. Safe and sane, what more can you ask?
I'm simply expressing the opinion that there are OTHER safe and sane ways to handle the situation that either expose or eliminate the danger just as quickly while simultaneously allowing for you to assist a person in need, should it turn out to NOT be a scam.
I'll say again. The OP is not me. He has no obligation to act or react in the manner that I believe that I would, and I have. He did fine. He's safe, that's priority one. Priority two, is helping people who need help, at least to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingEdward
But I didn't do that based on his approach and I can move forward in
peace.
|
And well you should, you did nothing wrong.