View Single Post
Old January 14, 2012, 11:26 PM   #19
browninghunter86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 2011
Posts: 524
yes. well I did this way based on numerous suggestions on Dan Newberry's load development http://optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/? I am new to this so tried a new method for this batch. Any suggestions on better way would be nice. out of those groups I believe 42.9 shot the best


So the method you just mentioned at some point the different loads will start hitting the same spot vertically at the target and then you use those loads to work up? I planned on loading 42.7,42.8,42.9,43.0,43.1,and 43.2 tom to see
browninghunter86 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03455 seconds with 8 queries