View Single Post
Old February 5, 2009, 01:23 PM   #49
Wildalaska
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
Quote:
My concern is that if it is so clear that Olofson is guilty, then why not give him what he asks for in regard to the ATF/Olympic letter and allowing his expert to be present during the testimony of the prosecution expert (as the prosecution agreed to)?
Becasue the letter wasnt exculpatory and Olafson is making a straw issue out of it. There are many reasons why the AUSA did not want to turn over the letter, heres one: The issue of safety of the person who wrote the letter in light of Olafson's background as an anti government zealot.

Olafson COULD HAVE subpoenaed Oly. He didnt. I suspect that was because they wouldnt have supported his allegation.

As to the expert, I suspect the same issue as I raised above.

WildallstrawmenfromaconvictedfelonAlaska ™
Wildalaska is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02316 seconds with 8 queries