View Single Post
Old March 12, 2012, 01:37 PM   #19
orangello
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Posts: 566
That training requirement doesn't seem too unreasonable, but in the area of 2nd amendment restrictions/"gun control" legislation, there seems to be a good bit of fear of laws that could be subject to something akin to "mission creep". I'm not sure why that is, but i doubt it is completely lacking in justification.

In MS, there are currently two options on carry permits: carry in lots of places without training using the basic permit, or carry almost anywhere with an "enhanced" permit and a couple of days of training. Of course, many people like me settle for no-permit-required, legal "car carry". I like having options, though.
orangello is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02918 seconds with 8 queries