The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

SHR970 · February 21, 2014, 12:15 PM

In my mind the worst outcome for those of us in Ca. at the moment is that San Diego does not appeal. The 9th does not take this up en banc and no cert. requested of the SCOTUS. This based off of the back and forth of the posters who obstensibly are members of the bar.

This scenario begs the question: Assuming that no en banc or cert. how does this affect the "May Issue" scheme in Ca. as a whole? As I live in a county which is as or more onerous in their "Good Cause" requirement than San Diego. would we (those of us in restrictive counties) have to mount a county by county court assault on their "Good Cause" requirements until we could compel the state legislature to codify it?

All the while we are left with the SCOTUS waiting to decide when to take up which case that would finally put one important question to rest: Do we have r right to bear arms for Self Defense out side of the home.

February 21, 2014, 12:15 PM	#146
SHR970 Senior Member Join Date: January 24, 2011 Posts: 1,427	In my mind the worst outcome for those of us in Ca. at the moment is that San Diego does not appeal. The 9th does not take this up en banc and no cert. requested of the SCOTUS. This based off of the back and forth of the posters who obstensibly are members of the bar. This scenario begs the question: Assuming that no en banc or cert. how does this affect the "May Issue" scheme in Ca. as a whole? As I live in a county which is as or more onerous in their "Good Cause" requirement than San Diego. would we (those of us in restrictive counties) have to mount a county by county court assault on their "Good Cause" requirements until we could compel the state legislature to codify it? All the while we are left with the SCOTUS waiting to decide when to take up which case that would finally put one important question to rest: Do we have r right to bear arms for Self Defense out side of the home.