The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

Matt Sutton · November 26, 2005, 09:51 PM

I owned and carried one for about a year. It's biggest strength is its size (or lack thereof). IMO, you can do a lot better for the same money if you don't mind a slightly larger weapon. They use a cheap bead blast finish, their frame mouldings are not nearly as precise as Glock's, HK's, or even Ruger's. They most definitely require a break in period. IMO, they are pushing a Kel-Tec quality product at a SIG price.
If you absolutely can't carry anything larger than the PM9, then go for it. If you can carry larger, look at a SIG p239 or a Glock 26.

November 26, 2005, 09:51 PM	#2
Matt Sutton Senior Member Join Date: January 20, 1999 Posts: 271	I owned and carried one for about a year. It's biggest strength is its size (or lack thereof). IMO, you can do a lot better for the same money if you don't mind a slightly larger weapon. They use a cheap bead blast finish, their frame mouldings are not nearly as precise as Glock's, HK's, or even Ruger's. They most definitely require a break in period. IMO, they are pushing a Kel-Tec quality product at a SIG price. If you absolutely can't carry anything larger than the PM9, then go for it. If you can carry larger, look at a SIG p239 or a Glock 26.