Quote:
|
So it seems, from the video.
|
If it's an attack, it's not defence and so is illegal.
If it was defence, it went way beyond the realms of "ending the threat" (whatever it might have been) and so it was not legal.
I don't see what extenuating circumstances might have occurred off-camera could make that justifiable behaviour by the assailant.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Karma. Another word for revolver: because what goes around, comes around!