View Single Post
Old August 13, 2017, 03:11 AM   #89
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 5,730
So it seems, from the video.
If it's an attack, it's not defence and so is illegal.

If it was defence, it went way beyond the realms of "ending the threat" (whatever it might have been) and so it was not legal.

I don't see what extenuating circumstances might have occurred off-camera could make that justifiable behaviour by the assailant.
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Karma. Another word for revolver: because what goes around, comes around!
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Page generated in 0.03236 seconds with 8 queries