The Rittenhouse trial was somewhat eye opening for me as far as ammunition goes. The prosecutor attempted to go down a rabbit hole regarding the type of ammunition used and I could not help but think "if he had been carrying something other than FMJ that would also have been used against him". His answer of "I don't know, a bullet is a bullet" was about as good an answer as he could have given under that line of questioning.
A google search shows mostly advertisements for CCW insurance with lawyers saying "don't carry handholds" although I did find this one article that discusses loading defensive ammo to save money:
https://gundigest.com/gear-ammo/relo...ive-ammunition
The closing paragraph is one I tend to agree with, to the tune of "worry about the legal ramifications afterwards, at least you survived".