View Single Post
Old May 14, 2009, 07:17 PM   #30
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 270
The difference is that firearms are constitutionally protected, body armour is not.
So absent 2A you'd be OK with gun bans?

There are no fundamental differences between the arguments raised in this thread against body armor, and the Bradyite arguments against classes of guns, and in fact against guns in general. The position of your eyebrows is immaterial and uninteresting.

And if someone decides to ninja up and wait for the Apocalypse, what business is it of yours?
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."

"Life being what it is, one dreams of revenge."
JustDreadful is offline  
Page generated in 0.02894 seconds with 8 queries