Thread: 586 -vs- 27
View Single Post
Old March 4, 2013, 10:40 AM   #17
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
Winchester_73 brings up a very good point about the underlug. While the actual difference in weight is quite small, the presence/absence of the full underlug makes a very disticnt difference in the balance of the revolver. My M28 (the plain-jane version of the M27) feels lighter in my hand than a 586 or comparable L-Frame because the balance point is over my hand rather than in front of it. In my hands, a full-underlug barrel longer than 3" feels much more muzzle heavy than a half-lug barrel of 4-6". Accentuating this further is the fact that the 586 has a heavy barrel while the M27/28 has a tapered barrel. Some people prefer a more muzzle-heavy balance point while others, myself included, prefer the balance to be farther back. The only advice I can give is to handle both and buy whichever you like the feel of better.
Webleymkv is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03176 seconds with 8 queries