The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

BusGunner007 · March 7, 2011, 10:53 AM

I had a Beretta 84FS that was 100% reliable.
The only reason I don't have it anymore is that it went in trade with a Beretta Tomcat 3032 for my Beretta Mini Cougar 8045F.
I wanted to cut down on calibers, and my Beretta 96's are .40, so I went with the Mini in .40.

The 84FS is the only firearm I've ever had with a 100% record of no failures of any kind.
Still, for ONE choice between the OP's dilemma, the full-size 92 fills all the niches.

March 7, 2011, 10:53 AM	#19
BusGunner007 Senior Member Join Date: December 14, 2001 Location: Upper Left Coast Posts: 2,116	Kickin' this one back up... I had a Beretta 84FS that was 100% reliable. The only reason I don't have it anymore is that it went in trade with a Beretta Tomcat 3032 for my Beretta Mini Cougar 8045F. I wanted to cut down on calibers, and my Beretta 96's are .40, so I went with the Mini in .40. The 84FS is the only firearm I've ever had with a 100% record of no failures of any kind. Still, for ONE choice between the OP's dilemma, the full-size 92 fills all the niches. __________________ "...if you're not havin' fun, you're workin'..."