I kinda remember this topic coming up a few years ago, not gun store sales but the 320 and AD’s . If I recall the theory then was that they admitted to the drop test fails in order to fix the problem They knew they had as it relates to the AD’s with plausible deniability .
The theory was , if they change the trigger for no apparent reason . That would lead to questions and more lawsuits. Therefore, if they could change the trigger for a different reason than what most lawsuits were claiming. They then can fix the known problem covertly under the guys of a different problem.
Isn’t the new military pistol basically a fancy 320? Is that trigger different? If that trigger is the same as the one in the 320s people are suing about. There’s no way they will ever admit a problem with that contract still in effect .
Anyways, that’s an interesting question. If I own a store, would I sell that firearm At this point, maybe not cause I think there is some reasonableness to the idea of gun store owners being sued next.
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !
I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . 
|