View Single Post
Old February 14, 2014, 05:18 PM   #91
Junior Member
Join Date: November 10, 2013
Posts: 6
For anyone who doesn't have time to trudge through all 127 pages, read this article, which came out today: Ninth Circuit Peruta ruling reveals faults with other circuit opinions

It analyses yesterday's 9th Circuit CoA victory in Peruta v. San Diego, in which Judge O’Scannlain's ruling and 127-pg majority opinion contradicted and flat-out shamed three previous CoA rulings (Drake in CoA 2, Wollard in CoA 3, & Kachalsky in CoA 4), and really thew down the gauntlet for the SCOTUS to take-up Drake v. Jerejian.

Good news methinks.

EDIT: Correction from Al Norris:
Kachalsky was CA2; Woollard was CA4; and Drake is CA3

Last edited by lake393; February 15, 2014 at 12:30 AM.
lake393 is offline  
Page generated in 0.03600 seconds with 7 queries