View Single Post
Old May 21, 2013, 12:25 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 2011
Posts: 1,755
Based on the little information available it does highlight an interesting point of intersection between law enforcement and peoples rights. AFAIK, a DV(but does disturbance=violence?) call does meet the standard of exigent circumstances to enter a private property. However, in theory, should a third party's(person who calls it in outside of the home) perception of commotion really over ride the occupants rights? Should LE be required to note some sort of corroborating evidence before exigence is established?
sigcurious is offline  
Page generated in 0.03250 seconds with 7 queries