View Single Post
Old May 12, 2013, 09:38 PM   #49
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 988
However, his innocence is in doubt since apparently his only factor for deciding the officer was another criminal was the tattoos... that's not a reasonable assumption.
Agreed. I find it a bit harsh that some of the other posters relate tattoos to bad guys. They are much more common than they used to be. While I do agree that visible tattoos can still be seen a unprofessional, a lot of military and police, including me, have tattoos. If tattoos and a civilian car are this guys only reason for thinking the cop was another bad guy, he's going to have a tough time in court, and I foresee a change in policy in the near future for the inked cops department.
Semper Fi

Marine, NRA member, SAF Defender's Club member, and constitutionally protected keeper and bearer of firearms
SHE3PDOG is offline  
Page generated in 0.03334 seconds with 7 queries