View Single Post
Old May 9, 2013, 09:45 PM   #39
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
Actually, unless we can prove causation (not just correlation), we have to assume it is a coincidence.

The fact that such laws did not lead to an increase in crime is a good point to make in an argument. However, the idea that the laws are responsible for a decrease in crime is something we can't prove.
Have to agree that it's like a fingerprint that had reason to be there at the crime scene.

I am just glad that it's more than the other side has.
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Page generated in 0.04195 seconds with 7 queries