View Single Post
Old April 27, 2013, 06:33 PM   #21
Deaf Smith
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,082

Sort of. The 696 should have been fixed sighted, no underlug, and a thinner 2 1/2 inch barrel.

They made it too heavy and with adjustable sights prone to snagging (after all, it was supposed to be concealment gun not a belt gun.)

Think about a 686 2 1/2 snub, but with a 5 shot .44 cylinder and barrel and fixed sights. Simple, powerful, and no sharp edges.

"The government has confiscated all of our rights and is selling them back to us in the form of permits."
Deaf Smith is offline  
Page generated in 0.03481 seconds with 7 queries