View Single Post
Old February 13, 2013, 10:00 PM   #117
Evan Thomas
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,144
Originally Posted by ClydeFrog
As for Willie's post, Dormer [sic] has a valid point but he's hardly worth any praise or admiration.
No one who has posted in this thread is admiring or praising him.

Originally Posted by Double Naught Spy
To my understanding, .50BMG is not allowed in CA by citizens. Barret Intl refused to sell or market .50 rifles & weapons to any CA law enforcement or public safety.
Numerous agencies in CA has these BEFORE Barrett stopped selling to or servicing from those agencies, however.
A sort-of-related point: Mr. Dorner is sort of a reverse poster boy for the notion, embedded in some of the current gun control proposals, that LEOs and former LEOs should be exempt from restrictions on "assault weapons" and high-capacity magazines.

This ought to be a bit of an embarrassment to those making such proposals: it certainly undercuts their claim that only "trained professionals" should be trusted with such things. Folks in law enforcement won't be happy if the proponents of such legislation start arguing that they, too, should be prohibited from owning them.
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry.
Evan Thomas is offline  
Page generated in 0.04583 seconds with 7 queries