View Single Post
Old January 28, 2013, 02:34 PM   #46
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 2011
Posts: 1,755
Yes, I read Heller front to back right after it came out. My point is that the Court has become so political that if the issue ever came up, the precedential value is minimal and therefore "arms" is whatever a majority of the Court says it is. Sad, but true.
While the foundation of your statement is true, ie arms are defined by the supreme court, your conclusion that the Heller decision would simply be ignored and a new definition would be set is a logical non sequitur.
sigcurious is offline  
Page generated in 0.03215 seconds with 7 queries