View Single Post
Old January 25, 2013, 03:16 PM   #39
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 10,526
We already have that, Skans, it's called the Second Amendment, and it would take a supermajority of state conventions to change it.

Meanwhile, you'd exchange universal background checks for the promise that the antis would not use such to create a registry, and confiscation framework?


Sounds like promises frat boys make to sorority girls...
Honestly, I don't know. Believe me, I'm not trying to convince anyone that universal background checks is a good thing or should be any kind of acceptable compromise. I'm just exploring this through discussion, that's all. I don't see the antis ever repealing the 86 or 89 bans or agreeing to some kind of super majority on more confiscatory laws, so I don't know if it really matters.
Skans is offline  
Page generated in 0.03167 seconds with 7 queries