View Single Post
Old January 23, 2013, 03:37 PM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
Never said it was... in fact I said Heller holds it to be an individual right.... I only said Heller referenced Militia and Miller which ALSO referenced Militia..

None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 , nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 , refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes.
JimDandy is offline  
Page generated in 0.05917 seconds with 7 queries