View Single Post
Old January 20, 2013, 08:59 PM   #7
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 1,735
So, basically, using Miller might be a lackluster argument because the Heller decision turned the interpretation of arms protected by the 2nd from militarily useful (in a not quite logical way) to "in common use?"

Either way, I think an argument can be made. It just seemed, to my non-attorney brain, that the Miller wording could make a pretty compelling argument.
raimius is offline  
Page generated in 0.04006 seconds with 7 queries