View Single Post
Old January 14, 2013, 04:20 PM   #47
Junior member
Join Date: October 13, 2008
Location: Hermit's Peak
Posts: 623
Perhaps its a difficult theory to prove...but my theory is absolutely that on the whole, the Mark III guns are a solid step below the Mark II's.
I have been under the impression that aside from the LCI and mag disconnect, there are virtually no differences. In fact, I do recall reading that the feed ramp was improved to help with reliability in the MKIII's. Am I missing other differences?

On the whole, I have heard of very few complaints about the MKIII.
AH.74 is offline  
Page generated in 0.03379 seconds with 7 queries