View Single Post
Old December 14, 2012, 01:03 PM   #11
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 5,975
One of the reasons I opposed the law in Washington was that the legal limit for impairment was very small.
If the same standard were applied to other situations a person could have not smoked for days and still be legally under the influence.

Another factor of the Washington law is that there is no defense. Once a driver is found to be over the limit they are automatically considered guilty.

This sure wouldn't be good news for anyone involved in a shooting.
Buzzcook is offline  
Page generated in 0.07276 seconds with 7 queries