View Single Post
Old December 13, 2012, 06:45 PM   #21
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Western Colorado, finally.
Posts: 19,118
Originally Posted by Captains1911 View Post
The cost of the suppressor and the $200 tax stamp have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
Well, there's no direct relationship but I maintain that the $200 expense does indirectly lead to higher prices by, 1, creating an expectation of a higher end product and, 2, discouraging lower income buyers thereby pushing the market toward pricier products.

After all, who would pay $200 to own a $50 product? Somehow, $200 doesn't seem so bad when the product is $800.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Page generated in 0.05410 seconds with 7 queries