View Single Post
Old November 27, 2012, 09:25 PM   #9
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 348
The usual argument against these laws--in my view the correct reasoning--is that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in acts occurring in public; it is no more a crime to record what is happening than to listen or view it as it occurs. There is no 'eavesdropping' on public speech. Phone conversations, by contrast, do bear a reasonable expectation that the conversation will not be overheard by others.
62coltnavy is offline  
Page generated in 0.03394 seconds with 7 queries