View Single Post
Old November 26, 2012, 12:09 PM   #150
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 3,603
Why do the military (and also some fed agencies) seemingly distrust the "striker fired / no external safeties" approach while the same works so well for hundreds of police departments?
I don't think it has anything to do with "distrust".

I think it has everything to do with the fact that the military already owns hundreds of thousands of M9s that do the job required of them, and there is no feasible economic, performance, or training-related reason to replace them with a striker-fired (or any other) design.
Fishbed77 is offline  
Page generated in 0.06030 seconds with 7 queries