View Single Post
Old November 22, 2012, 03:14 AM   #39
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 5,186
Like I said,I just may smell rat.This thread reminds me of some questions posed to politicians by reporters during a campaign .
Can't say for sure,of course.

What you are proposing is a lot like the idea of trading Liberty for Security.

Was it Benjamin Franklin? "Those who do will have neither."

I just cannot trust the thought process that would suggest this.

What has made progress toward restoring some lost Liberty?Filing suit,going to court,and winning a battle.Not trading.
Come to me with that,a suit to strike down NFA restrictions,I can respect your position.

The idea of offering up magazine capacity as a negotiating chip ?...No.The very thought of it makes me suspicious.

No one with an agenda to limit magazine capacity would consider lifting restrictions on NFA weapons.It does not add up.

Betrayal is the antidote for naivite.

Last edited by HiBC; November 22, 2012 at 03:24 AM.
HiBC is offline  
Page generated in 0.06415 seconds with 7 queries