View Single Post
Old November 19, 2012, 02:54 PM   #20
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 3,865
Short answer:

Because the military already has hundreds of thousands of M9s, and the Glock does not offer enough advantage to justify their replacement (and associated training & parts costs). So what if the Glock offers some incremental advantages (lighter weight, etc.). The M9 is already "good enough".
Fishbed77 is offline  
Page generated in 0.05160 seconds with 7 queries