View Single Post
Old November 14, 2012, 11:59 AM   #13
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Western Colorado, finally.
Posts: 19,118
Originally Posted by TailGator
Choosing not to promote firearms as not the same as overtly opposing firearm ownership.
And their position is a long way from simply "choosing not to promote firearms."

WWP does not co-brand, create cause marketing campaigns or receive a percentage or a portion of proceeds from companies in which the product or message is sexual, political or religious in nature, or from alcohol or firearms companies.
They will not accept donations from firearms companies or even appear on a firearms-based radio show to promote themselves!

That position is, IMO, much closer to "overtly opposing firearms ownership" than it is to "choosing not to promote firearms".
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
-The Architect
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Page generated in 0.04193 seconds with 7 queries