Mleake - you continue to miss my point. The tactical debates are just fine.
I specifically will continue to correct those who post that they must act because they could not live with themselves and because of that would take an action that might have a high probability of death. Not that they are willing to take the risk to save a child but that they can't live with themselves.
That specific reason is horse hockey from what we know about dealing with aftermaths.
Is that clear enough for folks yet?