View Single Post
Old September 20, 2012, 09:54 PM   #13
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,180
In order to believe that such a prohibition on firearms enhances public safety you have to believe that someone intent on committing a violent act would not do so because of the prohibition.

The government must prove that the regulation in question furthers a governmental interest. If public safety is the interest they are using then they must prove that it is furthered.

If a place is so sensitive that the government may ban all firearms shouldn't that place be protected by some type of security force?

I've never seen a guard at my local post office.
vranasaurus is offline  
Page generated in 0.03817 seconds with 7 queries